An Eternal Hell?
There seems to be a new online debate as to whether hell is an eternal punishment or a temporary one that ends in annihilation. Traditionalists claim that the church has always preached an eternal punishment of hell, so it must be. That is a pretty poor excuse for believing anything as the “church” has gotten many things unScriptural through the years. The contemporary teaching is that hell cannot be eternal because “I don’t like it”, which is just as wrong and makes God subject to your feelings.
Scripture would be the final authority in all spiritual matters, and describes punishment in the afterlife as …
(Mark 9:43-44) “And if thy hand offend thee, cut it off: it is better for thee to enter into life maimed, than having two hands to go into hell, into the fire that never shall be quenched: {44} Where their worm dieth not, and the fire is not quenched.” This is repeated in verses 46 and 48 as well so that you can get the point. (Revelation 20:15) “And whosoever was not found written in the book of life was cast into the lake of fire.” This is the same place as the eternal torment of Satan, Antichrist, and false prophet - Revelation 20:10 (Revelation 20:10) “And the devil that deceived them was cast into the lake of fire and brimstone, where the beast and the false prophet are, and shall be tormented day and night for ever and ever.”
Just to be clear, hell itself is brought before the Judgment of God at the destruction of the universe - Revelation 20:13. But there is no reprieve from the suffering. Hell is a fire [Mark 9:43], God is a fire [Hebrews 12:29] and then the lake burns with fire for eternity [Revelation 20:10]. This is the second death as they are cut off from the mercy of God forever [Revelation 21:8].
The real problem comes from the mental contortions performed from not rightly dividing the word of God [II Timothy 2:15]. They are trying to wrap their head around the fact that someone is going to spend eternity in fires of torment only because they rejected Christ, which is not true. I have heard all my life that to reject Christ is the unpardonable sin. If that is the case, then very very very few people are saved because hardly anyone accepts Christ the very first time they hear the gospel. They either ignore it or say no, but either way they reject it. Have they committed the unpardonable sin?
The unpardonable sin cannot be committed in the Church Age. We are justified by the faith of Christ [Galatians 2:16] rather than being justified by our own faith [Habakkuk 2:4]. After the church is raptured out, they will have to endure to the end to be justified [Matthew 24:13, James 2:].
To reject the gospel of Christ is for them to reject the cure for why they are already on their way to hell. Their own personal sin is why they go to hell [Romans 3:23]. God did not design hell for humanity [Matthew 25:41] and He certainly does not want anyone to go there [II Peter 3:9.] So, God also made a way for all of humanity to be saved [I John 2:2] and gave an invitation to all [Revelation 22:17.] All we have to do is trust the plan [Romans 10:9-10.]
The unpalatable truth is that mankind has chosen to sin against the laws of righteousness [Romans 2:14-15] and the law demands justice. That justice is eternal, just as our redemption is, and our feelings do not matter. These people are actually claiming that they are more merciful than God because they would not sentence anyone to hell forever. They are saying that they love humanity more than God, who by the way, became our sin so that we might be made righteous [II Corinthians 5:21.]
I hate the thought of hell. But instead of denying the judgment against our sin, how about we tell people the Biblical truth and how Jesus made a way for them not to go there. If we subject unlikeable doctrines to our personal feelings we have opened a door to destroy the faith of many.